<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Next Web &#187; Domain Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/tag/domain-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:08:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://thenextweb.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Facebook files dispute over facebook.info domain name</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2012/05/16/facebook-files-dispute-over-facebook-info-domain-name/</link>
		<comments>http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2012/05/16/facebook-files-dispute-over-facebook-info-domain-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robin Wauters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook.info]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=391436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="520" height="245" src="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/fbi-520x245.jpg" alt="fbi" title="fbi" /><br />On the eve of its blockbuster IPO, social networking giant Facebook has found the time to file a formal complaint with the World Intellectual Piracy Organization (WIPO) in an effort...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="520" height="245" src="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/fbi-520x245.jpg" alt="fbi 520x245 Facebook files dispute over facebook.info domain name" title="fbi 520x245 photo"  /><br /><p>On the eve of its <a href="http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2012/05/15/its-official-facebook-offers-50-6-million-extra-shares-price-range-34-38/">blockbuster IPO</a>, social networking giant <a href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> has found the time to <a href="http://www.udrpsearch.com/wipo/d2012-1008">file a formal complaint</a> with the World Intellectual Piracy Organization (WIPO) in an effort to get the domain name facebook.info transfered over to them.</p>
<p>Facebook.info was originally secured back in <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/facebook.info">2004</a>, and is currently registered to a NYC resident named Igor Dolgalev.</p>
<p>Currently, the site hosts some sort of Twitter-powered message board (the irony!) and a spam-infested forum. We&#8217;re going to go ahead and suggest you don&#8217;t visit the site, at least for the time being. Our educated guess is that a WIPO panel will soon decide that the domain name belongs to Facebook, and that it will be transfered over to them before you can say the word <a href="http://thenextweb.com/insider/2011/05/29/welcome-to-the-world-of-cybersquatting/">&#8216;cybersquatter&#8217;</a>.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t exactly the first time Facebook has filed a dispute over a domain name. In fact, the company <a href="http://www.udrpsearch.com/search?query=facebook&#038;search=parties">quite actively</a> tries to get domain names transfered over to them.</p>
<p>In the past, the company filed disputes over domain names like Facebok.com, Facebook.me, Facebook.nl, Facebook.es, Face-book.com, Facebook.com.au, FacebookDeveloper.com and, yes, KillFacebook.com.</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://thenextweb.com/google/2012/05/11/google-wins-a-whopping-763-domain-names/">Google wins a whopping 763 domain names</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2012/05/16/facebook-files-dispute-over-facebook-info-domain-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/fbi-520x245.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/fbi-520x245.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">fbi 520x245 photo</media:title>
		</media:content>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/fbi-520x245.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google wins a whopping 763 domain names</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/google/2012/05/11/google-wins-a-whopping-763-domain-names/</link>
		<comments>http://thenextweb.com/google/2012/05/11/google-wins-a-whopping-763-domain-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robin Wauters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=388707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="520" height="245" src="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/Photoxpress_10762465-520x245.jpg" alt="Graphic illustration of internet browser address" title="Graphic illustration of internet browser address" /><br />Google has obtained no less than 763 domain names containing the word &#8216;google&#8217; after recently filing a complaint with the National Arbitration Forum. In what Google calls &#8216;one of the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="520" height="245" src="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/Photoxpress_10762465-520x245.jpg" alt="Photoxpress 10762465 520x245 Google wins a whopping 763 domain names" title="Photoxpress 10762465 520x245 photo"  /><br /><p>Google has <a href="http://www.udrpsearch.com/naf/1434643">obtained</a> no less than 763 domain names containing the word &#8216;google&#8217; after recently filing a complaint with the National Arbitration Forum.</p>
<p>In what Google calls &#8216;one of the most aggressive campaigns of domain name infringement&#8217; that it has ever come across, someone had registered domains like googleiphone5.com, googlevodafone.com, googlegayfacebook.com, googleclooney.com, googlespiderman.com and googlenewshoes.com.</p>
<p>Google claims this person also forwarded the hundreds of domains to a site under the .xxx top level domain, and that this suggests that he or she was planning to host adult and/or pornographic content.</p>
<p>Amusingly, the respondent filed petitions to cancel two of Google&#8217;s US trademark registrations for the &#8216;GOOGLE&#8217; mark, and tried to defend the domain name registrations by asserting that &#8216;google&#8217; has become a generic term anyways.</p>
<p>The National Arbitration Forum of course ordered the domain names to be transferred to Google immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thenextweb.com/google/2012/05/11/google-wins-a-whopping-763-domain-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/Photoxpress_10762465-520x245.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/Photoxpress_10762465-520x245.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Photoxpress 10762465 520x245 photo</media:title>
		</media:content>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/05/Photoxpress_10762465-520x245.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our title suggestions were too offensive, so here&#8217;s the news &#8211; vatican.xxx is registered</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/insider/2011/12/21/our-title-suggestions-were-too-offensive-so-heres-the-news-vatican-xxx-is-registered/</link>
		<comments>http://thenextweb.com/insider/2011/12/21/our-title-suggestions-were-too-offensive-so-heres-the-news-vatican-xxx-is-registered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Olanoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.xxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vatican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=301272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="520" height="245" src="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/12/4646147868_f5b1f85dc0_b-520x245.jpg" alt="4646147868_f5b1f85dc0_b" title="4646147868_f5b1f85dc0_b" /><br />In case you haven&#8217;t seen the ridiculously obnoxious commercials, you can now buy .XXX domains for your adult&#8230;um, venture. One person picked up a cherry domain name, and nobody knows...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="520" height="245" src="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/12/4646147868_f5b1f85dc0_b-520x245.jpg" alt="4646147868 f5b1f85dc0 b 520x245 Our title suggestions were too offensive, so heres the news   vatican.xxx is registered" title="4646147868 f5b1f85dc0 b 520x245 photo"  /><br /><p>In case you haven&#8217;t seen the ridiculously obnoxious commercials, you can now buy .XXX domains for your adult&#8230;um, venture.</p>
<p>One person picked up a cherry domain name, and nobody knows who the buyer is.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/21/us-vatican-porno-idUSTRE7BK1JW20111221?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=technologyNews&#038;utm_source=dlvr.it&#038;utm_medium=twitter&#038;dlvrit=56505">According to Reuters</a>, The Vatican said they have no idea who purchased &#8220;vatican.xxx&#8221;</p>
<p>Just in case you were worried that the Pope was going into some sort of side-business, here&#8217;s what the Vatican had to say about the obviously offensive domain name:</p>
<blockquote><p>This domain is not available because it has been acquired by someone else, but not the Vatican.</p></blockquote>
<p>Whew, we&#8217;re glad that Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi cleared that up for us.  Even if the Vatican had purchased the domain name, it would have been a smart move to protect the church, and its brand.  Too bad someone slipped in and bought it before them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unlikely that owner will be able to get it up anytime soon, since the Vatican will probably sue them into oblivion for making a mockery of the church.</p>
<p><strong>Since we had a tough time coming up with a headline for this post, why not share your snarky suggestions in the comments?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thenextweb.com/insider/2011/12/21/our-title-suggestions-were-too-offensive-so-heres-the-news-vatican-xxx-is-registered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/12/4646147868_f5b1f85dc0_b-520x245.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/12/4646147868_f5b1f85dc0_b-520x245.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">4646147868 f5b1f85dc0 b 520x245 photo</media:title>
		</media:content>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/12/4646147868_f5b1f85dc0_b-520x245.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Sudan: A new nation with a domain name dilemma</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/africa/2011/07/07/south-sudan-a-new-nation-with-a-domain-name-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://thenextweb.com/africa/2011/07/07/south-sudan-a-new-nation-with-a-domain-name-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sawers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Sudan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/africa/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="520" height="245" src="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/07/Domain-520x245.jpg" alt="Domain" title="Domain" /><br />In case you missed it, July 9th 2011 is the date a new country is welcomed into the world. Back in February, southern Sudan voted overwhelmingly in favor of independence...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="520" height="245" src="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/07/Domain-520x245.jpg" alt="Domain 520x245 South Sudan: A new nation with a domain name dilemma" title="Domain 520x245 photo"  /><br /><p>In case you missed it, July 9th 2011 is the date a new country is welcomed into the world.</p>
<p>Back in February, southern Sudan voted overwhelmingly in favor of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12379431" target="_blank">independence</a> from Sudan, with 99% of the population opting to split Africa&#8217;s biggest country in two.</p>
<p>This Saturday the Republic of South Sudan will be born, and this will raise a number of practical issues for the country. Think about it &#8211; currency, stamps, passports, diplomatic relations and a whole new infrastructure all have to be considered when any new nation is born.</p>
<p>Then, of course, there&#8217;s the issue of domain names. Any country in the 21st century needs its own country code top-level domain (ccTLD), and Sudan already has .sd in the bag, so the Republic of South Sudan has a problem on its hands.</p>
<p>Countries essentially have the pick of any two letters within their name, and there aren&#8217;t many <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains" target="_blank">remaining</a> that begin with &#8216;s&#8217;. The Soviet Union has .su already (even though it no longer exists as a group of countries), which means the only obvious one that isn&#8217;t already taken is .ss.</p>
<p>Indeed, this is the ccTLD that South Sudan would like, but it&#8217;s unlikely to be allocated it by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The reason is that .ss has very negative connotations elsewhere. Stephen Lugga, a local official, told <a href="http://af.reuters.com/article/sudanNews/idAFLDE75S1AS20110629" target="_blank">Reuters</a> last week:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We want our domain name to be &#8216;.ss&#8217; for &#8216;South Sudan&#8217;, but people are telling us &#8216;SS&#8217; has an association in Europe with Nazis. We have applied for it anyway.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>South Sudan will be in a bit of a predicament if .ss is turned down. Even if we get a little creative with the country&#8217;s name, and use &#8216;.rs&#8217; as in &#8216;Republic of South Sudan&#8217;, this is already taken by Serbia. And .sn is taken by Senegal. In fact, all feasible letter configurations from the country&#8217;s name are already taken.</p>
<p>Arabic and English are the official languages of Sudan at present, so it may be fine to opt for a <a href="http://thenextweb.com/industry/2011/06/12/the-multilingual-web-a-year-of-non-latin-script-domain-names/" target="_blank">non-Latin script ccTLD</a> in Arabic, something that is now becoming increasingly popular.</p>
<p>But given that English is the <em>lingua franca</em> of the World Wide Web, it seems the new nation already has quite a dilemma on its hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thenextweb.com/africa/2011/07/07/south-sudan-a-new-nation-with-a-domain-name-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/07/Domain-520x245.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/07/Domain-520x245.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Domain 520x245 photo</media:title>
		</media:content>
<enclosure url="http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/07/Domain-520x245.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

