In a letter to its members last week, Associated Press made the announcement that bloggers should be cited as a news source. This is a significant move from the AP, given that they have a history of not exactly ‘getting on’ with bloggers. Given that such a large news organisation has made a point of recognising bloggers as a viable news source, which they should have done a long time ago, it has much wider implications on how bloggers affect the news agenda and overall news industry. We’ve already seen some developments in this area, such as publishers employing bloggers on the ground, but I think this goes one further than that. The announcement has served to recognise the work that bloggers put into breaking and reporting stories. But interestingly they make a point of saying that they must credit information where it occured from a website, so you would hope that this would cover Twitter as well, given that so many stories break on here. The details aren’t clear on quite what this attribution would look like (is it the website or the individual that’s credited?) but this is definitely a positive and exciting move.
Importantly this has implications for the individual blogger opposed to blogs overall. Even though the AP states that attribution to a blogger or other source doesn’t have to occur at the start of a story, it still means valuable visibility for bloggers in front of a wide audience. If you’re a blogger that breaks news then this has huge implications on how high up the news chain you could get. Instead of just having to go out and find stories yourself, if you get in front of the right people, it could mean that bloggers are approached with the right information and maybe even given exclusives ahead of traditional publications. This may be looking a bit too far into the future, but the possibility for this can certainly be seen now.
Are AP slow off the mark?
I don’t want to risk downplaying the significance of the move from AP, but you could very well argue that they’re actually a bit late to the game with their most recent change. In ‘The Source Cycle‘, an analysis of articles from the New York Times & Washington Post over 6 years finds that blogs are increasingly referenced as a credible news source. And this was carried out in 2008. It’s when you look at it in this context that you realise just how much work is still to be done when it comes to recognising bloggers and importantly growing the area overall. AP is a huge news agency yet only now are they making this change. As exciting as this announcement is, we must question who is looking after the blogger’s rights and how can they make a living from their blog? It’s one thing to attribute them as a news source, but you would hope that this change from AP may well affect the blogosphere overall and we may start to see more bloggers employed by news organisations who recognise the collective power of bloggers in regional areas. This is where blogger’s ability to influence and set the news agenda really starts coming in to play and can change the traditional news industry.A fascinating study by Pew into news online, finds that 99% of links to news stories in blogs, are to traditional news outlets or mainstream publishers. I find this figure incredibly surprising. Typically when I link to stories, I tend to link to other blogs not so much as a conscious decision, but because they’re what prompt me into writing a blog post myself. There’s simply more content out there on blogs, and I find it a bit juicier than that offered by mainstream publishers. Given that so many blogs rely on traditional outlets to reference in the post, you can’t help but wonder if there is a third way on offer here. Not so much journalist v blogger, but what skills do the two of them have together that can offer a unique news product?
A new project that shows just what’s possible for online collaboration and news – is TBD.com. Its a local news site that focuses on Washington, DC. The owners describe the site as an ‘integrated newsroom’ which is enough to get the juices flowing in itself! Importantly, it aims to bring different news sources and types together online, to offer realtime news from a wide range of sources. It combines in a very real way, traditional journalists, bloggers and other online news sources, in what they collectively call their community network. And the people that make up this network see their own work on the site, not just an aside as a news source. This shows the potential of what’s possible as we increasingly seek new ways to consume our news, combined with publishers finding new ways to monetise – think the Times’ paywall. This in itself shows that there’s big changes to come in the structure of news organisations. The traditional monetisation routes need to change, and with it so does the overall layout of the newsroom. We’re seeing this start to happen now and in a couple of years our news outlets will probably look completely different. I belive that blogging is largely the reason for this change and I look forward to what’s coming next.
















This is shift in the power of the media from talking heads to twitter fingers.
This is the future of the online media but it need to be a reliable blogger source. They’re many gossips and hoax out there.
3 quick points:
1. I would second David’s concerns but I think this new model could work. The main difference between bloggers and (traditional) journalists is the presence of an editor – someone to sanity-check, fact-check and legal-check all stories. In this instance AP acts as the editor and double-checks the blogger’s story before publishing it (we assume!), lending it an extra layer of credibility.
2. I think one of the reasons why (as stated) 99% of news links in blogs go to mainstream news sources is because those sites have that sense of reliability and accountability.
3. There’s a new news site about to launch in Ireland called theJournal.ie, which seems to have a similar model to TBD.com. Will be very interesting to watch it develop.
As long as the reporter does her/his due diligence and confirms the accuracy of the information they receive, there shouldn’t be any problems with this. Besides, the reporter should be following up as they would with any source.
If you didn’t see this coming you haven’t been paying attention. The AP has been on the ropes as far as resources go. Readership and circulation of print media are down as people become web-aware and less likely to wait for print to get their news.
This being the case, even the AP has had to change the way it gathers the news.
As far as worrying about the accuracy of information… It is probable that even the AP will get burned from time to time with the need to get fast news overriding the time it takes to confirm the news.
Eventually it comes down to the readers to decide what is true by checking where they get their news.
The internet allows everyone a chance to look up sources and get more than one version of almost any story. If readers want to believe that aliens have been consulting our presidents since the 1950′s they’ll find some source that back up their version of the truth.
As long as the AP “links” to their blogger source it will be great for bloggers online credibility, which in turn should make them work harder at being a worthy news source.
This is a ploy in the game that will require all ‘bloggers’ to be licensed in the near future.
Great story.. I had written post but it disappeared. I agree with author that is LONG TIME coming since sources in news traditionally have always been credited – even if only with the word anonymous.
I was interested in the comment about licensing that was made and have noticed pressures by government to try to control internet increase as well as the pressure to tax or make revenue from online directly rather than indirectly.
As a whole tv news media seems to be digressing into chat and using twitter facebook as part of their news as well as a means to interact with audiences.
Blogging, news and social media already seem to be morphing and it will be intereseting to see how it shapes in the next few years. Blogging has already affected politics and American life in a way noone enviioned 20 years ago.
http://alrady.blogspot.com/2010/09/ap-begins-crediting-bloggers-as-news.html
This is the future of the online media but it need to be a reliable blogger source. They’re many gossips and hoax out there. http://www.buygenericultramadol.com/
very nice article
http://www.hedeya.net