Facebook just announced on its blog that it is rolling out a litany of privacy-related updates that streamline its various interfaces, simplify privacy control, and add more power in the hands of users.
Facebook has always had a feature similar in function to Google+’s Circles but it has so far been underemphasized and complicated to use. It is now being moved to the forefront, with the lock button under the sharing widget getting a more verbose and prominent look. The button will now spell out exactly which groups or individuals can see each post you make to the website. The company is also replacing the word “Everyone” for each post’s privacy settings to “Public”, to better reflect its meaning.
You will also now be able to change the visibility settings of individual posts after they have been published. This is a significant change and will eliminate the frustrating routine of having to delete and re-post something because you accidentally made it public when you’d meant to hide it from that one friend you were gossiping about (not that I would ever do such a thing). It also—finally!—allows you to go back and edit the privacy settings for posts you’d made in the past to include new friends you may have made since then to the list of exceptions.
Facebook is making it much easier for users to control which sections of their profile can be seen by which audiences. Where previously you had to visit the privacy settings page to control the visibility of your profile, several sections of which were outside the purview of privacy control, you will now have the ability to customize who gets to see which parts of your profile from the profile page itself.
The tagging feature is also getting a significant overhaul, with the main change being an opt-in preference in your privacy settings that will enable you to approve any posts or media you have been tagged in before the tag is made public tagged item appears in your profile, allowing you to have tighter control over what content on Facebook you are associated with. This is especially helpful given that Facebook will now be allowing you to tag even people you aren’t friends with in posts and photos.
With great power comes great responsibility, however, and some people may not always know how to use that power responsibly. Therefore, if you ever get tagged somewhere you’d rather not be (and you do not have the approving tags feature enabled because you trust your friends so much), you will be able to press a button to either untag yourself or politely request the person to take it down entirely. Or you can just go ahead and block that person, which removes the tag and makes sure you never see them again (except, you know, in real life).
The Preview My Profile button allows you to view your profile as anyone else on Facebook would see it and it is, understandably enough, a very popular feature. However, it has so far been buried under ‘Account » Privacy Settings » Customize Settings’, which is not the most visible of places on Facebook. It is now being renamed to View Profile As and moved right to the top of your profile page, making it much easier to access.
The Places feature is going away, to be replaced by location tags. Where previously you could only check in to places you were at using the Places feature in Facebook’s mobile apps, the company is now making it possible to tag any location to any post or photo you publish to your profile from the website itself (and presumably from the company’s mobile apps once they are updated to include the feature).
This means that you can tag a restaurant you like when you are talking about it on Facebook without actually having to be there while you do it. Optionally, you will also now be able to have your current location tagged with every post you make to the site, like you can on Twitter.
Facebook says that it will be rolling out the changes gradually over the course of the coming days and everyone will be able to lay their hands on them soon enough. Some things about the new changes remain unclear—for example, if your privacy settings prevent someone from seeing a photo you post but you tag them in it, how would the conflict be handled—and we’ll get a fuller picture of their impact in the social network space once they start finding their way to users. One thing is for sure though: interesting things lie ahead.
Update: An earlier version of this post incorrectly stated that the new tagging changes will allow you to prevent yourself from being tagged in photos by asking for your approval beforehand. The changes Facebook is making only affect the posting of tagged content to your profile, not tagging itself. You can, of course, still remove your tag from content on Facebook separately if you so wish. Thanks to reader Victoria Cassady for spotting the error and sending in the correction.

















Facebook is still a polished turd and now bringing those “hidden we don’t care so much about” fetaures to the forefront to compete with Google+.
Just my 2 cents and how I feel.
Watch out Facebook – you are starting to show your fear of Google.
Hello,everybody,the good shop ping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let’s facelift bar! ===== http://www.vipforshopper.com ==== Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 UGG BOOT $50 Nike s h o x(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12 New era cap $9 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18 FREE SHIPPING vfdxb v
Hello,everybody,the good shop ping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let’s facelift bar! ===== http://www.vipforshopper.com ==== Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 UGG BOOT $50 Nike s h o x(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12 New era cap $9 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18 FREE SHIPPING vfdxb v
Hello,everybody,the good shop ping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let’s facelift bar! ===== http://www.vipforshopper.com ==== Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 UGG BOOT $50 Nike s h o x(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12 New era cap $9 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18 FREE SHIPPING vfdxb v
Hello,everybody,the good shop ping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let’s facelift bar! ===== http://www.vipforshopper.com ==== Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 UGG BOOT $50 Nike s h o x(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12 New era cap $9 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18 FREE SHIPPING bvc
The reality is that all this is pretty irrelevant, given Facebook’s track record of making random fundamental thoughtless changes to its privacy controls. What prevents Facebook from undoing ALL these changes in the future? The answer is nothing, and “the future” can be as soon as three months or less if history is any indicator.
What use are these when you still can’t distinguish between a specific network and all networks, long after it has screwed up network-based privacy control? Right, you WILL be able to edit privacy settings retroactively. How are you supposed to find all those posts you need to fix? This is just pathetic.
ball dresses ball gown ball gown wedding dresses ball gowns black cocktail dresses blue prom dresses bridal gown cheap cocktail dresses cheap evening dresses maternity evening dresses modest prom dresses long evening dresses long prom dresses mother of bride dresses mother of the bride dress mother of the bride dresses tea length mother of the bridedress mother of the groom dresses night dress night dresses one shoulder dress party dress party dresses pink dress pink dresses plus size plus size cocktail dresses plus size evening dresses plus size formal dresses plus size prom dresses cheap formal dresses cheap prom dresses
a line dress http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses-a-line-wedding-dresses.html backless dress http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses.html backless dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses.html ball dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses-ball-gown-wedding-dresses.html ball gown http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses-ball-gown-wedding-dresses.html ball gown wedding dresses hhttp://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses-ball-gown-wedding-dresses.html ball gowns http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses-ball-gown-wedding-dresses.html black cocktail dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses.html blue prom dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses.html bridal gown http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses.html cheap cocktail dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses.html cheap evening dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses.html maternity evening dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ modest prom dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ long evening dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ long prom dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ mother of bride dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/mother-of-the-bride-dresses.html mother of the bride dress http://www.wholedress.co.uk/mother-of-the-bride-dresses.html mother of the bride dresses tea length http://www.wholedress.co.uk/mother-of-the-bride-dresses.html mother of the bridedress http://www.wholedress.co.uk/mother-of-the-bride-dresses.html mother of the groom dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/mother-of-the-bride-dresses.html night dress http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ night dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ one shoulder dress http://www.wholedress.co.uk/wedding-dresses.html party dress http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ party dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ pink dress http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ pink dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ plus size http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ plus size cocktail dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ plus size evening dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ plus size formal dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ plus size prom dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ cheap formal dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/ cheap prom dresses http://www.wholedress.co.uk/
Thanks and very helpful since I have never ever not even once gotten and update from Facebook themselves… and have been there for 7 years now even both my kids have Fb accounts.. I am very appreciated for such detailed information that I have passed it on to several of my social media networks online too.
I don’t think it has anything to do with the fear of Google. FB faces the inventors dilemma (look it up). They want to do more updates and improve certain aspects, they just can’t. It’s about time they do something with their privacy controls like this though.
I counted three features straight stolen from Google+. Maybe in an upcoming feature we’ll see Facebook supports drag-and-drop friend listing.
Who cares ? “social networks” are for dumb boring sheep anyway
Who cares ? “social networks” are for dumb boring sheep anyway
This might be Facebook putting lipstick on a pig in respect to privacy, but I still think they’re in the social networks driver’s seat. Google+ still has some features to add themselves before they can truly compete with FB.
This might be Facebook putting lipstick on a pig in respect to privacy, but I still think they’re in the social networks driver’s seat. Google+ still has some features to add themselves before they can truly compete with FB.
Copycat
@y t Mmmkay
@y t Mmmkay
Google+ was really a good contender to challenge Facebook but with Facebook devising the new privacy settings which apparently looks quite good it will be a hard pill for Google+ to swallow. Their hangout feature was a good feature too. Now Facebook has come head to head with Google+ on new features and application development. Let’s see how this war goes on. Google+ is still to launch the Business account at Google+ which can be really challenging for Facebook if it turns out to be a good one. Let’s see and hope for a better tomorrow with those Giants fighting to over-take each other in the tech-race!
It is good to see Facebook reacting well to the shortcomings Google+ brought to light. I wonder if Facebook users will react with the same ire they have had for previous improvements to the interface.
It is good to see Facebook reacting well to the shortcomings Google+ brought to light. I wonder if Facebook users will react with the same ire they have had for previous improvements to the interface.
@Ben McNulty I don’t think we can even compare these to their previous “improvements”, many of which aren’t really “improvements” at all—I would even say most were “degradations”.
@Ben McNulty I don’t think we can even compare these to their previous “improvements”, many of which aren’t really “improvements” at all—I would even say most were “degradations”.
“You will also now be able to change the visibility settings of individual posts afterthey have been published. This is a significant change and will eliminate the frustrating routine of having to delete and re-post something because you accidentally made it public when you’d meant to hide it from that one friend you were gossiping about.”
The fact, that a content publisher can change visibility of the post after that post is made is – in my opinion – fundamentally wrong, because people who then comment can never be sure who would see their comments. On Google+ they made a principal decision that ACL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_control_list) stays unchanged once a post is made (although it’s generally possible to add individual users with “@-reference”.)
Roberto Bayardo from Google explained this to me.
Too little too late.
@Ben McNulty I agree there will be plenty of resistance to this, even though its a much needed update, I’m sure the change-fearing masses on facebook will do their usual complaining.
@Ben McNulty I agree there will be plenty of resistance to this, even though its a much needed update, I’m sure the change-fearing masses on facebook will do their usual complaining.
“Social” networks? Who are you promoting?
http://wp.me/p1Mrnd-2H
the Bozo.
Well, facebook’s time is almost up. They know that the privacy benefits in G+ are brilliant. Its been a try to detrack the G+ fans back to facebook. However, facebook’s “copying” has just in a way promoted the increasing popularity of Google+. Their response has proved the point that G+ hit in the bull’s eye that social networking needs to be more private and secure than facebook’s previously mediocre privacy.