4G network technology has arrived in Oslo and Stockholm thanks to wireless carrier TeliaSonera.
As of Tuesday, people in Norway and Sweden will be able to buy a mobile dongle that supports the long-term evolution (LTE) of 4G.
The technology can deliver speeds of up to 100 megabits per second–ten times faster that its 3G predecessor.
In a press conference in Stockholm on Monday, Karlberg said LTE makes it possible “to do everything that you can do on the fixed network, but on top of that, [the network adds] the mobility dimension”. He said this combination of mobility and fixed-line-quality speeds and bandwidth would allow for “applications that we haven’t seen so far”.
At launch, TeliaSonera’s LTE services cover around 400,000 people in the centres of Stockholm and Oslo. However, the operator said it is adding base stations every day. That aside, users primary frustration will lie in the fact that no handsets can yet use 4G meaning customers will initially only be able to connect via a dongle and a laptop.
Until July 1, consumers keen to try out the technology will receive the modems for free and pay a subscription price of just 4 kronor a month. The price will then will increased to 500 kronor a month.
TeliaSonera said it expected the boost in speed to drive many novel applications including gaming on the move and much greater viewing of video on laptops.














The technology can deliver speeds of up to 100 megabits per second–ten times faster that its 3G predecessor.
This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed
wow!. Sweden & Norway are so far ahead.. you just want to move. We are being milked on 3G here with unrealistic bandwidth limits…
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Through the silence one can hear AT&T whisper, "oh sh*t"…
This comment was originally posted on Digg
that’s weird, your comment here appears on that site
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Damn those socialists with their technology and higher standards of living!4G sounds great. Can’t wait til we get that in about 7 or 8 years.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I don’t even know what the hell 3G is and these countries are already on 4G?!
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I guess they’re not Finnish yet.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I’m still on my 2G iphone and am completely satisfied!
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Why…last I checked Norway and Sweden weren’t much competition to AT&T.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I call bullshit.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I want to live in Sweden or Norway.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
You sir, are in denial.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
WTF is a Dongle?
This comment was originally posted on Digg
haha you said dongle
This comment was originally posted on Digg
It’s the angle your wang dangles at.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Wow, I am qite impressed
RT
http://www.total-privacy.es.tc
I still don’t have 3G in my city of 90,000. :(
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Yeah there was an article in The Register about this:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/14/lte_deploy …But it’s no big deal. You get a USB adaptor for your computer and really fast speeds but much more latency than DSL or Cable. Also the adaptors are not 3G compatible so you only get reception in a handful of areas. Plus there are no LTE mobile phones. So at the moment who cares? I’d much rather have FTTH or even FTTC VDSL2.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
they always get the good stuff… 4G, snow, solid shapes, Within Temptation, bright colors, melmac, swiss army knives, beanbag seats, Templar Knights, Soilwork, pressboard furniture, Let the Right One In, crazy looking light fixtures
This comment was originally posted on Digg
yeah.. but they also have Basshunter.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Yea thats really hard to get 4G working in a country that is less than the size of texas.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
1krona=15cent
This comment was originally posted on Digg
4G wimax service via Sprint, Clear, and Comcast in Philadelphia…
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Rode Island, Connecticut, Vermont, and a ton of other US states that are far smaller than these countries, according to you, they should already have 100% coverage of 4G then.Idiot!
This comment was originally posted on Digg
70 bucks per month? Ouch.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I just want to remind people that even if Norway and Sweden have far fewer people and a small area in square miles, think about this:Norway has approx 4.5 mill citizens spread over an area that covers the distance from Miami to Boston and from the East Coast to Memphis Tennessee. In the same geographical area here in the US, there is over 100 million people living and as such, much easier to provide coverage than in Norway.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Ladies and super fast porn, The Sweeds live the life
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Verizon’s planning on rolling out to 30 markets next year. They did a trial roll out in Seattle a couple months ago.http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/14/verizon-tests-f …
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I’ve been using 3.5G (Pre-Wimax) for over a year in Nevada through Clearwire. True 4G Wimax is available from Clear (same company, different branding) in a handful of cities, including most of metro Atlanta. I’m really surprised Europe didn’t have it before us.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Is that their Whispernet?
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Forget that… I’m still using analog!
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I’m holding out for 10G
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Just the fact that 4g is starting to roll out, and they are not able to keep up with the 3g bandwidth.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I thought that was Amazon…
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Can’t wait till we get that in 2025.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
1crooner=50cent …
This comment was originally posted on Digg
sucks to have an iphone, droid ftw :)
This comment was originally posted on Digg
EarlOfLade1 hr 31 min agoRode Island, Connecticut, Vermont, and a ton of other US states that are far smaller than these countries, according to you, they should already have 100% coverage of 4G then.Idiot!Read the comments next time?
This comment was originally posted on Digg
mo G mo problemswait that doesn’t sound right..
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I think I’d rather see them deploy Battlestations instead of Base Stations. Galactica FTW!
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Sorry to be the grammar …secret police (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8fbrUjjivw%29, but it should be "The angle at which your wang dangles."Sounds funnier that way, too. Still dugg up, though. :D
This comment was originally posted on Digg
By then they’ll have moved to 5.5G and we can buy all their 4G crap at discount bin prices…
This comment was originally posted on Digg
Says the guy that misspelled Rhode Island.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I didn’t know Swiss was a nordic state. I thought it was in central Europe…the nice Germans, jå.
This comment was originally posted on Digg
damn glad i wasn’t taking a drink when i read that!
This comment was originally posted on Digg
I’ll be a crooner for a buck
This comment was originally posted on Digg
And I hear the women are pretty hot over there too! Only bad thing is that it is cold!
This comment was originally posted on Digg
whereas, we in India have been debating and debating and some more debating on the 3G implementation from the start of 2001…we are in a relative Stone Age! We Indians, it seems, lack the determination and focussed vision to achieve things faster…we’d rather prolong prolong and prolong some more..probably when 5G is implemented, we’d be getting down to do the same with 3G in phases, most likely by 2020!
Sri Lanka is leading in Asia, with 3.5G coverage already..
Yeah, but then you have to live in a place like Philadelphia. :(
This comment was originally posted on Digg
It is far worse here in the US. 3G might be achievable in the center of major metro areas, but take a jaunt in the country, and you will be back to 2G speeds if you get any signal at all.
Of course, while the world is upgrading their networks, most cellphone providers here in the US are upgrading absolutely nothing but their fees. In fact, services like tethering are completely vanishing, and instead of getting service, one gets excuses like “well, tethering was not meant for modern days where there are more than 10,000 websites.”
4G is commercial for a year already here in Russia. I pay $30/month.
Hey Ivan. I’ve heard about your ’4G’ and it doesnt even go near the speed mentioned in this post.
So yeah, say what you want, but this is way fucking better technology and the speed is amazing.
You may have had it for a year now, but from the information I’ve been given, the ’4G’ you’ve got over there truly suck. Really, really bad.
I suppose wimax is 4g and we have it here in Pakistan since 2007 but we dont even remotely get those speeds.
in Australia, taxpayers are spending $40-60Bn for a fibre network to offer those speeds of 100Mbps (to 90%+ of population) within 7yrs. our wireless here is a joke, patchy and slow at the best of times (unsurprisingly for a large sparsely inhabited continent). the OECD figures show this level investment is worthwhile meanwhile, however the telcos mostly argue we won’t get 100Mbps FTTH speeds as the networking gear can’t handle the projected usage volume. thought we were free of the Telstra fraudband stranglehold, but we’re not out of the woods yet.
it seems that speeds are almost becoming faster by the day, does anyone care anymore