*Important Update at The Foot of Post*
First direct, a division of HSBC, has launched a microsite devoted to highlighting its customers opinions from across the web.
In what appears to be a world first, the bank’s head of marketing explains the campaign:
“Our customers are writing about us all over the web and we want to embrace this, so we’re showing customer comments, good and bad, from websites, blogs and forums for everyone to see. We’re also encouraging uncensored feedback on a range of issues and we’re inviting everyone to participate in the conversation at www.firstdirect.com/live…Research shows that the banking sector does not score well when it comes to openness and transparency, but this is something that we are keen to change at first direct with this microsite.”

The company launched the campaign based on research undertaken in September 2009 with 2,095 adults aged 18+. In a release, the company says that their research has shown over 80% of Brits use social media once a month and 53% are now creating and actively sharing content online.
Their research has also shown:
- 79 per cent of people are active online each month, using social media
- One third maintain a profile on social networking sites
- Almost a fifth (18 per cent) contribute to online forums through comments and a third read online forums
- 14 per cent pass on reviews and articles via the internet
- 41 per cent of over 55s publish, upload and contribute online
- 36 per cent believed they were more open online because it was a sense of helping others and, surprisingly, just three per cent comment and contribute because they feel they are experts.
The microsite, although seemingly well put together, doesn’t seem to give any link back to where these comments have come from. Although they claim the reviews come from “eight million social media sites”, not one appears to stem from Twitter where can verify these are real people. For all we know, HSBC have internal staff writing comments made to look genuine or writing comments on the original sources intending to increase the postive review tally over the negative.
The fact that a bank is immersing itself in the wave of social media culture is undeniably a good thing, but its going to take much more to regain customer trust after the recent banking disasters. That said, HSBC were one of few banks not go to the government for funding.
The microsite is part of a wider campaign also involving Mindshare, JWT London and Cheethambell JWT that includes digital outdoor, press and online media.
*Update:*
If you needed any more proof this is far from a balanced view on the company’s customer feedback, check out HSBCReviews.com. A site put together for a “bit of fun” by a company called thruSITES. Thrusites specialises in designing, building and launching online communities, Facebook applications and widgets.
The company say they were just “bored” and “thought it would be fun to build a little which analyses mentions of HSBC on Twitter and displays tweets containing positive or negative sentiment. This time, you may be surprised to learn the general sentiment is bad with links back to the original profiles to ensure we know these are thoughts are genuine. (Thanks: Reputation Online)















Isn’t HSBC a Chinese bank?
This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed
It stands for Hong Kong Shanghai Bank but it was started by some Scots and is a UK corporate, despite it’s large operations in SE Asia
There’s more on the HSBCReviews thing in a post from yesterday’s Reputation Online http://bit.ly/L0aej.
Also, on the First Direct thing, I’ve just seen a ‘live feed’ of the info appearing on a tube advert in Holborn.
Live? I doubt it very much…
If these are real people’s real comments, then it’s a brave project – and could be impressive if the bank collates the top grumbles and actually addresses them.
I agree it’s disappointing though that the comments lack transparency – as you say, you can’t test their authenticity by click throughs to the original comments. With the “feeling” section I was expecting a “We Feel Fine” type interaction – go to http://www.wefeelfine.org/movements.html and click to launch the applet.
As a first direct customer of close to 10 years I was quite intrigued to hear about this site, and naturally put it to the test. I can safely confirm that since my comment was submitted 3 hours ago, a mild expression of dissatisfaction about about fd cards being blocked every time you leave the country, another 5 inane comments, mostly positive have been approved. Still nothing for mine. And if you get the message, “comment a subject to approval and must comply with our [link] terms and conditions, why is it that every comment has a “report this comment” link next to it? Do you really think they would let anything offensive through? This type of insult to the intelligence of its customers is typical of the bank.
I suspect the site is a total fraud and, given that fd marketers have shown over the years they think they’re particularly clever, am not surprised at all.
Hats off to http://hsbcreviews.com – this is *much* closer to the truth.
I think first direct are pretty much on safe ground, they are one bank brand with an excellent reputation in the UK.
This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed
I think it’s brave of them to try and tackle it in the UK since my understanding of the English is that they grumble the most but put up with the most b*******t of anyone. If you were going to do this for real anywhere, why do it there?
Some real service a bank not in self-caused
problems would for instance posting this well
known video with Peter Schiff and other financial experts (in the US) in 06 / 07, forecasting and advising. That was at the height of the media hype accompanying the bubble. Really impressive for instance Ben Stein (3rd part) praising the banks above all: “their earnings are huge”, “they are (the shares) dirt cheap, the bargain
of the century.” That’s before they crashed and needed huge taxpayer funds.
Implicitly, the video shows the dominant role
of pundits and the media. It is considered
awesome.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw
Hi,
It could be that “first direct” is an ambiguous brand to track, e.g. “first direct missile strike” and so they are applying relevancy filters that only apply to “first direct” – the bank – and nothing else. Their coverage is pretty positive, so I’m not overly surprised they score so highly.
J.
This comment was originally posted on Attentio Blog
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your comment!
As an agency contact reminded me, they are fussy on what clients they accept so there maybe an argument that they have less unhappy clients because of that. When I check in “real time” there are times when the buzz is mainly positive, interestingly normally twitter people saying they like the new site. It is still amazing that over the long haul they have such positive sentiment in comparison to negative and neutral – but if they disclose methodology I can be proven wrong, right?
S.
This comment was originally posted on Attentio Blog
Interesting article. ASOS have just launched http://www.asosreviews.com, which shows that raw customer reviews sites like HSBCreviews.com are not necessarily a bad thing if your brand is popular and you are doing all the right things to keep your customers happy.
In my opinion, the overall negative sentiment shown on HSBCreviews.com suggests that a lot of content on the first direct site is rigged.