The Next Web

The Power of Physical News. What the Internet doesn’t provide.

The Power of Physical News. What the Internet doesnt provide.I am in an airport at the moment, something that I am beginning to think that we all do too much, and I have no internet connection. I refuse to pay $14 for an hour of connectivity.

It is probably worth the money, but the principle of paying for a service that (all the good) airports generally provide, like water fountains, miffs me. I digress.

I picked up a copy of the Wall Street Journal ($2), and deposited myself into one of the lovely Southwest comfort chairs, and read the paper.

I mean, I hit every page of all the sections. Even the one pager on sports, trying as it was. This is what happened: I learned more in the last thirty minutes reading the Journal than I have in the past week reading hard news (not tech related) online.
I am a bit surprised by this revelation. I had never tried to compare the utility of reading offline and on directly, but it makes sense. Allow me to explain.

You read more, and more diversely when reading a newspaper. One story leads you to the next. And, when you are in the middle of section A, you see much more than a series of headline links. It drives you to keep reminding.
Once you complete the story on the health care reform bill, you note the article on the deficit, and then current Afghanistan policy, and so forth.

Online, I am always in a bit of a rush, moving towards the two sentences of the article that comprise the news bit of the point, before bouncing to a picture of a rabbit with a pancake on its head. You think that I am kidding.

To put it plainly, when physical newspapers are gone (talk to me in a few years, maybe three), I am going to miss them. Not too much, this only happens at backwards, anti-blogger, airports, but the point is made.

One other note, the quality of writing tends to be better offline than on. Given the news cycle in the blogosphere, say 37 seconds from wire story to post, versus a daily cycle, people have more time offline. You can really get into the wordsmithery , something that is so often lost online.

I know I must sound a like a dinosaur, but think about it. Actually, go pick up a copy of the New York Times, or the Wall Street Journal. Get some coffee, and read the damn thing. Then tell me there is no value to print.

Tags: ,  

  • Holden Page
    And now you know why I purchase the daily star tribune bro :D
  • How did you post that blog if you had no internet connection?
  • DE
    good point, poorly written - which is a good way to illustrate the difference between offline & online ;-)
  • Fair point actually, I wrote this in an airport, between flights. Hardly optimum conditions.
  • I think it's obvious that the reason why you fully digested the newspaper was because you didn't have any other distractions. To compare online to offline, you didn't have people coming up to you every minute or two to tell you something quickly (i.e. a tweet), you didn't have the mail man dropping off new deliveries on the chair next to you every few minutes etc.

    I don't get why you've compared online blogs, which are put together very quickly as you say, to newspaper articles, which have a higher quality, when the vast majority of them do get posted online. It sounds like you're completely missing out the middleground - i.e. newspapers online.

    The value of print as a medium *is* disappearing, as it's bad for the planet, and distribution is slow and expensive. What you've recognised is the value of quality/professional journalism, which can of course be found on the web if you're reading the right sites.
  • Your point on distractions is dead on, but you lose me on online newspapers. I agree with you that online newspapers are something of a middle ground, but that hardly invalidates the blog to newspaper analogy.

    Your final point misses my whole point, the format of print can bee useful.

    Anyway.
  • But blogs and newspapers are very different, as you've admitted yourself, so why recommend people go and buy a physical newspaper, when they can read all the same quality articles online? And if it's just that they/you get distracted by all their online notifications, you/they can easily just turn them off. The issue here isn't the medium (the web), it's the way you use it (by multitasking between various services), the sites you choose to read and how you are reading them.

    Sorry, I don't see how the medium of newsprint - i.e. printing text and images onto paper in a factory and then transporting it overnight to vendors all over the country/world at considerable cost - has any real advantage over reading the same text and images, but also with video, audio, related links, live reader comments and much more, on the web (using a desktop machine, laptop/netbook, games console/webTV, mobile device/eReader or public information screen).
  • Well, for starters, you cannot read blogs offline, so people tend to consume more blogs and less newspaper (odd wording) online.

    Also, as you said, distractions abound online. You can turn them off? Really? Do you ever? I cannot recall a time, ever, when I turned off TweetDeck for anything excpept the girlfriend.

    The medium itself is the power, the format lends itself to reading more boradly, and more in depth. Given that the articles are not designed for headline pull, but for news, they are more accurate, less opinionated, etc.

    Tech blogging is a whole different breed. No newspapers could do what we do.
  • True, you can't easily read blogs offline (though this paper just started in the UK last week that does bridge the gap - http://theblogpaper.co.uk ), but arguably you wouldn't bother as a typical blog post is just a personal opinion by somebody who isn't professionally recognised and thus isn't really worth of being put into print anyway. Though that's where theblogpaper may shake things up a bit, surfacing the quality blog posts above all the dross.

    I switched from Tweetdeck to Seesmic Desktop a while back as it happens, but yes, I do shut it down sometimes as it can be a CPU hog, and during peak periods on a week day I can have notifications almost constantly popping up which is a distraction from work (I'm a freelance web developer), especially as I also use Trillian Alpha with connections to at least 8 online networks. But I *can* read a long web article without getting distracted, with notifications or not, if I put my mind to it!

    I disagree about the headline pull - every newspaper article has a headline! I suppose the difference though is that very few people browse inside a newspaper before buying it - i.e. the publishers have already got their payment, and it's only the front and back page headlines that really need to stand out - whereas online each and every page view is worth something in advertising revenues.

    It's interesting how you see this site as a tech blog, as opposed to just tech news. Is that because you write articles like this which are more opinion/comment based? Or just because (I'm guessing) most of the 'news' comes from elsewhere and you are just putting your own spin/opinion on it?
  • Khaled AlSaleh
    Great post. I think newspapers should stick to producing content and leave the distribution to sites like the huffington post.
  • andy
    well put
blog comments powered by Disqus
 


TwitterCounter