The Next Web

Twitter worm still not dead. Mikeyy’s contact details and photo (possibly) made public.

Twitter worm still not dead. Mikeyys contact details and photo (possibly) made public.Twitter’s latest breach, the StalkDaily twitter worm is in it’s fourth mutation and continuing to cause aggravation across Twitter.

The twitter team have continued to give vague reports of the issues being resolved, however it appears the worm is still very much alive and sneakier then ever.

Tweets such as these listed below have been posted giving tips as to how to remove the Mikeyy worm.

  • How TO remove new Mikeyy worm! RT!! http://bit.ly/yCL1s
  • This worm is getting out of hand Twitter. - Mikeyy
  • Twitter, your community is going to be mad at you… - Mikeyy

They request you RT, but that then continues the spread of the worm.

Haklab gives further pointers as to how to remove the work from your profile:

1. Change your hex color/reset it
2. Change your bio and change the URL
3. DONT click on any profile that is suspicious and use another twitter client like TweetDeck instead of the Twitter website

Interview and His Contact Details

Tech site NetNewsDaily managed to grab an interview with Mikeyy in which he goes into details as to why he created the worm (boredom) and when he plans to stop (whenever Twitter can fix it). The best way to apparently keep yourself clean is to disable Javascript in your browser settings or just not visit Twitter altogether. Mooney also makes clear that Twitter have not contacted him about the matter.

Interestingly, someone has listed his contact details (including Address, parents contact details and his previous school) in the comments of the interview post – and since Mikeyy decided to post legal threats in the comments of this post, we’ll assume they are real.

On attempting to call Mikeyy, there was no response and neither one via IM (AIM). It’s difficult to say whether the contact details are genuine but they are pretty precise. His “mother’s” name, phone number and address appear in Google Phonebook, though again, it’s difficult to be sure how genuine. We’ll continue to dig and let you know what we come up with.

image credit


  • nick botulism
    I wonder if this is his mom's myspace.

    The other details match (including the mention of a teenage son named michael).

    http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction...
  • Interesting article. But it seems very irresponsible to me to post a "real" name and address, and even *more* irresponsible to repeat it here. These worms have annoyed a lot of people...
  • Assuming for a moment that those details are legit, isn't it a bit irresponsible to republish them here?
  • Ed
    Others wrote:

    "But it seems very irresponsible to me to post a “real” name and address, and even *more* irresponsible to repeat it here."

    "Assuming for a moment that those details are legit, isn’t it a bit irresponsible to republish them here?"

    I couldn't agree more with the two commenters. I expected better of this site, I'd assumed the people behind it were legit and professional. This is the last time I get involved with this operation.
  • Mikeyy
    I demand this information to be removed before I contact my attorney, yes, I've made worms but like everyone else said you have no right in posting blatant information like that.

    Regards,
    Mikeyy
  • Yekla
    You have a lot of nerve, making worms that invade people's accounts and then throwing around legal threats when people, who are sick to death of this kind of shit, retaliate. People are sick of viruses and worms and trojans, so they're going to retaliate when the opportunity presents itself.

    Worms are an invasion of privacy. You made a worm. Now your privacy is being invaded. How's it feel?
  • Ed
    Yekla. if you'd taken the time to read the original post by Zee, whose colleagues now condone the publishing of private telephone numbers and addresses on a public site, you would have seen that he wrote "[Twitter] made clear no passwords, phone numbers, or other sensitive information were compromised as part of this attack."

    So who's privacy was invaded?

    Having said that I can see I'm wasting my time here, obviously the readers and writers of this blog have no more sense of right or wrong than the teenage hacker they clearly want to feel superior to.

    This guy was an anonymous idiot with nothing to lose. The owners of this site have clearly spent time and money building a public profile, and have ended up looking as dumb as the bored 17 year old. If I was an investor I know which way I'd be walking right now.
  • Ed
    Hey Mikeyy, just go ahead and sort an attorney out anyway, I'd be happy to support you. I don't condone what you did, but the guys running this site went over the line here. If they're happy to do it to you they'll do it to anyone.

    Make sure you contact the site's advertisers as well and point them towards this page. It'd be interesting to see how happy they are to be associated with these kind of privacy breaches. In fact, thinking about it, I'll do that myself as well.
  • Mikeyy
    Thanks for the support Ed, yeah, I know the worm wasn't the best idea. But look on the bright side, the worm was a temporary affect that caused no actual harm, yet if I had not made the worm(s) then everyone's information would be at risk of being compromised. By information, I mean your email, password, or mobile number. If people opened their minds up and based their opinions on the long terms than short terms they would agree with me, if not then they might as well join a site that allows you to post all your information to the whole Internet.

    Regards,
    Mikeyy
  • Ed
    Well, if I can be honest with you, I think the worm was a dumb idea. I get how you're trying to justify it, but as you say so yourself, it probably wasn't the best move you ever made.

    But - and this is a big "but" - there are privacy laws in place for a reason, and they should be respected. In this case, two wrongs most definitely do not make a right, and the people running this site are on shaky moral and legal ground.

    I'm assuming from their lack of action, or response to the earlier comments on here questioning what they did, that they simply don't give a shit. Well, arrogance is one thing, but privacy breaches are rarely lawful, and hardly ever justifiable.
  • Mikeyy
    I agree Ed, I have contacted my attorney and he said he will get in contact with the provider of the website.

    Regards,
    Mikeyy
  • I admit we could have just as well linked to the other article instead if repeating it here as Mikeyy's contact details are publicly available online and can be found on many websites including the one where we got it from.

    I wouldn't have minded deleting the information from this post but since Mikeyy has already 'contacted his lawyer' I guess might as well wait for that. A few things might happen:

    1: we never hear from Mikeyy again (highly likely)
    2: Mikeyy actually has a lawyer (unlikely) and he will explain to Mikeyy that maybe he should focus on the million dollar lawsuit and impending jail time instead of trying to sue a blog in another country for disclosing data that is publicly available.

    I will update this post as soon as anything happens. Don't hold your breath...
  • Ed
    So you're only prepared to do the right thing when you're forced to by lawyers? What's the matter with you people? I thought you were running some kind of commercial operation.

    Having said that, now the details have been deleted are we supposed to assume that you've been contacted after all?

    Seriously guys, you're coming off as no better than a teenage hacker. Way to go.
  • No, as expected, nobody contacted us. We were planning on deleting the information anyway as they added nothing to the post and the information was available elsewhere.

    But the irony of Mikeyy spending time on something futile like this instead of his real problems wasn't lost on us so we decided to play along and wait for his attorney to show up.

    Of course he never did.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 


TwitterCounter