<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You a Twitter Snob?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:16:24 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara Celli</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-524506</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara Celli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 04:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-524506</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a compliment to me if someone follows me. That means they&#039;re interested in what I&#039;m talking about, and to ignore them is rude. Plain and simple. I used to have a different take on this subject, but I realized I wasn&#039;t being nice to people by excluding them from the &quot;honor&quot; of reading my tweets. Who the heck am I any way, the Queen of England? I&#039;m just a regular person, and I&#039;m not gonna treat my followers like I think I&#039;m better than them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a compliment to me if someone follows me. That means they&#8217;re interested in what I&#8217;m talking about, and to ignore them is rude. Plain and simple. I used to have a different take on this subject, but I realized I wasn&#8217;t being nice to people by excluding them from the &#8220;honor&#8221; of reading my tweets. Who the heck am I any way, the Queen of England? I&#8217;m just a regular person, and I&#8217;m not gonna treat my followers like I think I&#8217;m better than them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RecruiterGuy</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372889</link>
		<dc:creator>RecruiterGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372889</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...
In the same vblog we&#039;re telling people:

* It&#039;s not social media unless everyone is following everyone - regardless of conversations taking place.

* Don&#039;t be a &quot;Twitter snob&quot; - follow everyone and even automate your re-follows (because automated following is very &quot;social&quot;)

* Not following people is like turning your back on them at a party (would love to see Perry speak individually with all 70,000 people at a party he throws.)

* Create and manage multiple accounts so that you&#039;re not an &quot;asshole&quot; (because you have time for this - as a side note, tweetdeck would let you create groupings, Perry... and it&#039;s free also... perhaps another &quot;a-hole&quot; cure?)

* That Perry needs to go unfollow people because there are some he shouldn&#039;t be following (that doesn&#039;t sound very social.)

Ref the comment about Solo Media vs. Social Media - it&#039;s a bold assumption that Rose doesn&#039;t carry conversations and respond with @ and DM&#039;s or that he doesn&#039;t like or acknowledge people he&#039;s not following. 
Because someone doesn&#039;t auto-follow 70k people doesn&#039;t make them un-social.

--= THE BOTTOM LINE =--
The beauty of Twitter is that everyone can use Twitter however they see fit - and none of them are wrong.  Calling them out as snobs or abusers because of who they do or don&#039;t follow would just seem to be arrogance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;<br />
In the same vblog we&#8217;re telling people:</p>
<p>* It&#8217;s not social media unless everyone is following everyone &#8211; regardless of conversations taking place.</p>
<p>* Don&#8217;t be a &#8220;Twitter snob&#8221; &#8211; follow everyone and even automate your re-follows (because automated following is very &#8220;social&#8221;)</p>
<p>* Not following people is like turning your back on them at a party (would love to see Perry speak individually with all 70,000 people at a party he throws.)</p>
<p>* Create and manage multiple accounts so that you&#8217;re not an &#8220;asshole&#8221; (because you have time for this &#8211; as a side note, tweetdeck would let you create groupings, Perry&#8230; and it&#8217;s free also&#8230; perhaps another &#8220;a-hole&#8221; cure?)</p>
<p>* That Perry needs to go unfollow people because there are some he shouldn&#8217;t be following (that doesn&#8217;t sound very social.)</p>
<p>Ref the comment about Solo Media vs. Social Media &#8211; it&#8217;s a bold assumption that Rose doesn&#8217;t carry conversations and respond with @ and DM&#8217;s or that he doesn&#8217;t like or acknowledge people he&#8217;s not following.<br />
Because someone doesn&#8217;t auto-follow 70k people doesn&#8217;t make them un-social.</p>
<p>&#8211;= THE BOTTOM LINE =&#8211;<br />
The beauty of Twitter is that everyone can use Twitter however they see fit &#8211; and none of them are wrong.  Calling them out as snobs or abusers because of who they do or don&#8217;t follow would just seem to be arrogance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob573 (Robert Bockenkamp)</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372888</link>
		<dc:creator>rob573 (Robert Bockenkamp)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372888</guid>
		<description>Are You a Twitter Snob? http://tinyurl.com/6a8jkg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are You a Twitter Snob? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6a8jkg" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6a8jkg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baxter Tocher</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372887</link>
		<dc:creator>Baxter Tocher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372887</guid>
		<description>Perry Belcher makes a very valid point, which I&#039;ve used as my own benchmark since I first started using Twitter. I don&#039;t follow people like Rose or Kawasaki (or Scoble, for that matter). If they&#039;ve anything valid to say, it&#039;ll filter through Twitter anyway. If not, it&#039;ll just get lost in the noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perry Belcher makes a very valid point, which I&#8217;ve used as my own benchmark since I first started using Twitter. I don&#8217;t follow people like Rose or Kawasaki (or Scoble, for that matter). If they&#8217;ve anything valid to say, it&#8217;ll filter through Twitter anyway. If not, it&#8217;ll just get lost in the noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proxy Bar &#187; Introduzione a Twitter</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372885</link>
		<dc:creator>Proxy Bar &#187; Introduzione a Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372885</guid>
		<description>[...] twitter snob è uno abbonato a pochi canali, magari con un seguito immenso, ma che segue pochi canali. Un esempio [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] twitter snob è uno abbonato a pochi canali, magari con un seguito immenso, ma che segue pochi canali. Un esempio [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the__edge (Dave)</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372886</link>
		<dc:creator>the__edge (Dave)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372886</guid>
		<description>Watching: &quot;Are You a Twitter Snob? « &quot; ( http://tinyurl.com/6a8jkg )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching: &#8220;Are You a Twitter Snob? « &#8221; ( <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6a8jkg" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6a8jkg</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372884</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372884</guid>
		<description>Since everyone uses Twitter for their own reasons, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any golden ratio when in terms of the optimal number of followers to following.

For me, I follow everyone that interests me, and though I&#039;m currently following more than a 1,000, I still don&#039;t feel overwhelmed by it. In addition, since I follow those that I find interesting, I&#039;m not put off by the fact that some people that I follow don&#039;t follow anyone back. If that&#039;s how they want to use Twitter, then I&#039;m just as free to not follow them as they are to not follow others. True, they&#039;re not getting the full value out of Twitter that I get out of it, but they&#039;re not wasting my time either; they just feel that they have other places where their social media time is better spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since everyone uses Twitter for their own reasons, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any golden ratio when in terms of the optimal number of followers to following.</p>
<p>For me, I follow everyone that interests me, and though I&#8217;m currently following more than a 1,000, I still don&#8217;t feel overwhelmed by it. In addition, since I follow those that I find interesting, I&#8217;m not put off by the fact that some people that I follow don&#8217;t follow anyone back. If that&#8217;s how they want to use Twitter, then I&#8217;m just as free to not follow them as they are to not follow others. True, they&#8217;re not getting the full value out of Twitter that I get out of it, but they&#8217;re not wasting my time either; they just feel that they have other places where their social media time is better spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oyvind Solstad</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372883</link>
		<dc:creator>Oyvind Solstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372883</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... None of the above choices. You should follow interesting people. I would say that most people who follow me are people that are interested in me and/or the stuff I&#039;m doing and working with. Which of course means that people who follow me are into the same stuff as I do. So when someone follows me, I check their Twitterfeed and if it looks remotely interesting, I hit follow. 

Which in turn means that I have a little bit more people I follow, than people who follow me. 

BTW, I&#039;m Oyvind on Twitter: twitter.com/oyvind</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; None of the above choices. You should follow interesting people. I would say that most people who follow me are people that are interested in me and/or the stuff I&#8217;m doing and working with. Which of course means that people who follow me are into the same stuff as I do. So when someone follows me, I check their Twitterfeed and if it looks remotely interesting, I hit follow. </p>
<p>Which in turn means that I have a little bit more people I follow, than people who follow me. </p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m Oyvind on Twitter: twitter.com/oyvind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIBR Mister EDgAr h</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372882</link>
		<dc:creator>TIBR Mister EDgAr h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372882</guid>
		<description>You mean like what tweetdeck does!? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean like what tweetdeck does!? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIBR Mister EDgAr h</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/11/are-you-a-twitter-snob/#comment-372881</link>
		<dc:creator>TIBR Mister EDgAr h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=8441#comment-372881</guid>
		<description>How about people do what the hell pleases them and the dork police stays out of other people&#039;s life!?

My followers/following ratio is about equal but I don&#039;t follow people just because they are following me, I&#039;m not an attention whore! I follow those I want to base on my own rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about people do what the hell pleases them and the dork police stays out of other people&#8217;s life!?</p>
<p>My followers/following ratio is about equal but I don&#8217;t follow people just because they are following me, I&#8217;m not an attention whore! I follow those I want to base on my own rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

