The Next Web

» Ex-Google engineers launch ‘Cuil’, the first results – The Next Web

   

Ex-Google engineers launch ‘Cuil’, the first results

joop Written on 28th July 2008                                                                                                              10 COMMENTS some text
Joop Dorresteijn, East Asia correspondent

Search engine Cuil launched this Monday. Cuil is the brainchild of Anna Patterson, who sold her last internet search technology to Google in 2004. This time, she believes that the technology is more valuable and she is not planning to sell it. We wonder, is this a Google competing internet revolution, or just another search engine?

Yet another search engine?

Not really. Cuil (pronounced ‘cool’), is backed with VC investments of $33 million dollars (€21 million). The search engine not only applies link analysis and traffic ranking, but analyzes context and displays similar results in groups and categories. With help of The Internet Archive, Cuil is supposed to have the biggest index of the web. “Cuil searches more pages on the Web than anyone else—three times as many as Google and ten times as many as Microsoft.”
Ex Google engineers launch Cuil, the first results

Cuil’s Key features

  1. Biggest Internet search engine Cuil has indexed 120 billion Web pages, 3x more than any other search engine
  2. Organized results Cuil’s magazine-style layout separates results by subject and allows further search by concept or category
  3. Different results Unlike other search engines, Cuil ranks results by the content on each page, not its popularity
  4. Complete privacy protection Cuil does not keep any personally identifiable information on users or their search histories

The team

The technology was designed by a team with a lot of experience in search, as stated: Anna Patterson has worked at Google as a search engine architect and leader of the page ranking team. She leads the Cuil team together with her husband, Mr. Costello, who researched and developed search engines at Stanford and IBM. They founded Cuil together with Russell Power, Anna’s former colleague from Google.

First impressions; amount of search results

Results turn out to be not really relevant, but we have to keep in mind that the site has been released just a few hours ago. An example is when we searched for “the next web”, we couldn’t find any results, however “next web” gave relevant results.

The picture you see here is a relative measurement of search results. The red bar is Google, blue is Cuil. When looking at the number of search results, we find that Google’s results are much, much more extensive. I want to emphasize that its not about the amount of the index, but the relevant results. So far, Cuil does not seem to be relevant in its results. Let’s give it a bit more time, and measure its effectiveness in a month or so.

Ex Google engineers launch Cuil, the first results

UPDATE: you might also want to check out Yuil. Its a parody site that looks exactly like Cuil but uses Yahoo results which seem to be better than Cuil’s results. Ironic.

About the author: Joop Dorresteijn Joop is writing to us from Seoul, South-Korea. Besides sniffing around for the latest LG and Samsung innovations, he reports from the emerging start ups from this country. He also works with new media for ING Life, the multinational insurance firm from the Netherlands. Want to see more? See his HDR pictures and blog from Korea and subscribe to his Twitter account here.

10 comments/trackbacks to “Ex-Google engineers launch ‘Cuil’, the first results”

  1. Jul 28, 2008: Cuil Fails At Naming Itself. Preview of their Future Failure. « MyMediaMusings

    [...] Ex-Google engineers launch ‘Cuil’, the first results [...]

  2. Jul 29, 2008: CUIL - μια νέα μηχανή αναζήτησης που ξεπερνάει το Google « OMADEON

    [...] Ex-Google engineers launch ‘Cuil’, the first results [...]

  3. Jul 29, 2008: Black is the new Google: Cuil.com : The Next Women

    [...] week saw the launch of search engine Cuil, pronounced [KOOL]. Founder and President of Cuil is Anna Patterson, who is on [...]

  4. Aug 1, 2008: Web-Suche - es tut sich was - Netzlogbuch

    [...] drei mal so viele Seiten zu indizieren wie Google es tut. Doch verfolgt man die cuil-Tests diverser Blogger, so scheinen die Suchergebnisse nicht wirklich befriedigend zu sein. Allerdings sticht die [...]

  1. By Jonarthan Marks on Jul 28, 2008

    Tried it but it came up with very strange results! Don’t truist it yet.

    Reply

  2. By Jonathan Marks on Jul 28, 2008

    Not sure what happened in the previous posting. Let me try again. I remember switching from Altavista to Google in 1999 because it was clear that the results from Google were better – and therefore more useful. Just tried Cuil on things I know – and the results were awful. Photos of people were mixed up and, in general, I didn’t trust the results. So, for the moment at least, I wouldn’t trust them to find material I don’t know about – the reason for search in the first place. Should be wait to see what happens? Absolutely! Does Google need to be worried? Not for some time yet.

    Reply

  3. By Milan Vasic on Jul 28, 2008

    I share your opinion Marks,google gives me more specific and much better results than cuil, thats the current situation.
    We need to support ideas like this, because I think that the google is alone in search engine list. Microsoft live and yahoo, and others are so far away.

    Reply

  4. By David Petherick on Jul 28, 2008

    I think the semantic aspect is potentially very useful, but there are problems with semantics that require human input.

    For example, Scotland Yard is the HQ in London, England for the Metropolitan Police. It does not therefore merit a separate index tab when searching for “Scotland”. So how do I drop in the semantic message to Cuil to educate it when there’s no mechanism for me to do that?

    I have also found my own reference pages appearing with other people’s photos, which does not inspire great confidence!

    I really do hope Cuil succeeds, and I also hope that they are hiding some features for now which might, when revealed, and when working properly, make it a vital tool. But at the moment, it’s not even an adequate search tool.

    Reply

  5. By Edwinek on Jul 28, 2008

    I like the interface, but that’s about it. One thing I noticed is that I can’t use quotes to search for phrases (like my own name). And not finding many meaningful results to a query is a bit of a minus for a search engine. My website could only be found by one word from its title, but not by its entire title. Still, I do wish them good luck and hopefully it will one day be a useful tool.

    Reply

  6. By Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten on Jul 28, 2008

    I must say that I kinda liked the new interface. Don’t know about the results either so I’m going to give them another try in a month or so…

    Reply

Post a Comment


Add your button here too.
Only €99 a week (100.000+ pageviews = less than € 1 CPM!)
Upload your button now.




Copyright 2006-2009 © TheNextWeb.com - Entries (RSS) / Comments (RSS)