Google News-suing Copiepresse loves to look back

Written on May 28, 2008 – 4:41 pm
Ernst-Jan Pfauth, editor in chief

Some media companies are still holding on to their old-values, desperately trying to make money like they used to. Take Copiepresse for example, this Belgian French-language newspaper company wants Google News to pay them 49 million Euros. Why? Because Google News drives traffic to their sites? Because Google News introduces kids to this strange phenomenon called newspapers? No.., the way Copiepresse sees it, Google News is stealing away ad revenue by indexing the articles published by Copiepresse’s newspapers.

$Google\'s frontpage after the last Copiepresse court case$ Sad but true, Copiepresse has already won a case like this against Google in 2006. And now they’re after the money.

Apart from the fact that Copiepresse can prevent the indexing by creating a robot.txt file, their attitude is simply embarrassing. Instead of profiting from all the beautiful opportunities the new web offers, Copiepresse just focuses on destruction.

Not only symbolizes this complaints of many media experts like Dan Lyons - aka Fake Steve Jobs-, it also ruins the reputation of traditional media in general. There’s a lot of talent and potential in that industry which I and probably many others would like to welcome in this beautiful new world, yet their executives are way too busy looking backwards. I’m sorry guys, those good old one-to-many days are almost over.

I hope you like that post!

The Next Web Blog covers start-up news from all over the world (not just the Valley), exciting new technologies and inspiring entrepreneurs. If you're new here, you may want to read our 'About' page and subscribe to our RSS feed.

Do you have a start-up that we should write about? Contact us! Thanks for visiting and hope you come back again!

claim, copiepresse, court case, google news, Press

About the author: Ernst-Jan is blogger and co-organizer of BLOG08, who previously worked in New York to cover news at the United Nations. Next to writing, he's also a singer in the band Christina Five. Follow him on Twitter or read his personal blog Dutchproblogger.com .

About a month ago I reported that Belgian newspaper publisher Copiepresse demanded that Google should pay €49 million to compensate for the damage listings in Google News had caused them. A weird case, and not...

How Deep Is Your Love?

Today is Valentines day and it shows. Do you have a Twitter account? Twitter the universal internet symbol for a heart at someone you like and they will receive a custom Valentines heart "@username <3"...

Blognetwork PaidContent acquired by The Guardian for an impressive $30 million

Wow, I think I'll keep blogging for a while. Apparently these online publications can be the start of a small fortune, as blog network PaidContent has been acquired by (former-)traditional media player The Guardian for...

5 comments/trackbacks to “Google News-suing Copiepresse loves to look back”

Jul 2, 2008: Belgian newspapers continue to attack news aggregators
[...] a month ago I reported that Belgian newspaper publisher Copiepresse demanded that Google would pay €49 million to [...]

By Jos on May 28, 2008

I haven’t done a background check on this, but if it’s true then it makes me wonder what kind of lawyers Google hired in 2006? It *seems* that a lawsuit like this should be easily won since (like the article says) if Copiepresse REALLY cared, they would’ve taken 5 minutes of their time to create a robots.txt and block every spider from ever entering their website…

[Reply]
By Edial Dekker on May 28, 2008

@Jos I doubt Google can oblige Copiepresse to make a robot.txt; it’s yet another said story where old media tries to control everything. TechCrunch had a great article on this a few days ago as well http://www.techcrunch.com/2008.....ol-issues/

[Reply]
By Peter on May 29, 2008

Why not just remove their site addresses from Google index? I think the newspapers would be hurt by NOT being listed.

[Reply]
By QS on May 31, 2008

This seems a rather strange story. There’s an easy way out for both parties, and yet, according to the info in this post, neither are willing to make a move to end the dispute. Sounds fishy to me.

[Reply]

The Next Web