<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live.com: bigger than Google in September 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:23:52 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Green</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361201</guid>
		<description>For anyone that cares. I did heard from ManagedQ support. I was able to uninstall with ease. They were professional, prompt and efficient. 

I suggest you give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone that cares. I did heard from ManagedQ support. I was able to uninstall with ease. They were professional, prompt and efficient. </p>
<p>I suggest you give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Green</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361200</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361200</guid>
		<description>I like ManagedQ, however, trying to uninstall it from Safari on a Mac proves to difficult. I&quot;m still waiting for support to tell me how to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like ManagedQ, however, trying to uninstall it from Safari on a Mac proves to difficult. I&#8221;m still waiting for support to tell me how to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexandru ionescu</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361199</link>
		<dc:creator>alexandru ionescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361199</guid>
		<description>i agree with laurent. live search is nowhere near google... pfiuf... that&#039;s a release :D when i saw the title post i freaked out... i like google... google is all you can get best from all internet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with laurent. live search is nowhere near google&#8230; pfiuf&#8230; that&#8217;s a release :D when i saw the title post i freaked out&#8230; i like google&#8230; google is all you can get best from all internet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361198</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361198</guid>
		<description>Live Search usage is nowhere near Google. The traffic details reveal much more.

Where people go on Live.com:
mail.live.com 78%
login.live.com 14%
spaces.live.com 5%
search.live.com 1%

Where people go on Google.com:
google.com 60%
mail.google.com 14%
images.google.com 9%

In addition Google also has a lot of localized search engines. Just scroll down the list and see at least 20 Google domains in the top 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live Search usage is nowhere near Google. The traffic details reveal much more.</p>
<p>Where people go on Live.com:<br />
mail.live.com 78%<br />
login.live.com 14%<br />
spaces.live.com 5%<br />
search.live.com 1%</p>
<p>Where people go on Google.com:<br />
google.com 60%<br />
mail.google.com 14%<br />
images.google.com 9%</p>
<p>In addition Google also has a lot of localized search engines. Just scroll down the list and see at least 20 Google domains in the top 100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaacov</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361197</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaacov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361197</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see where your lines match up using a logarithmic chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see where your lines match up using a logarithmic chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Finch</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361196</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361196</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting article. However, the problem is that Live has only one search engine for all over the world, and google have at least 20. Individual search engines that act as their own entities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting article. However, the problem is that Live has only one search engine for all over the world, and google have at least 20. Individual search engines that act as their own entities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361195</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361195</guid>
		<description>@Mads valid points! Except that Gmail is also part of the google.com domains as far as Alexa is concerned...

@Mark yeah, I decided to not be TOO hard on Google in my method. If you use the same starting point it looks very different...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mads valid points! Except that Gmail is also part of the google.com domains as far as Alexa is concerned&#8230;</p>
<p>@Mark yeah, I decided to not be TOO hard on Google in my method. If you use the same starting point it looks very different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361194</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361194</guid>
		<description>Your unscientific method seems to be favoring google more, since you have taken the most recent upward turn as the place to start your line from. Anyway James/Derek, you dudes are a bit transparent since nobody talked about ManateQ before you two!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your unscientific method seems to be favoring google more, since you have taken the most recent upward turn as the place to start your line from. Anyway James/Derek, you dudes are a bit transparent since nobody talked about ManateQ before you two!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361193</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361193</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also checked out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.managedq.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ManagedQ&lt;/a&gt;, which is a new search application startup. They layer natural language processing and a pretty awesome UI over Google results. This is definitely the right route to take in terms of taking search to the next level. Most other startups try to rebuild the search engine, which is fruitless. I&#039;ve found them to be more effective than Google for finding what I want. It&#039;s nice to see some new technology in search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also checked out <a href="http://www.managedq.com/" rel="nofollow">ManagedQ</a>, which is a new search application startup. They layer natural language processing and a pretty awesome UI over Google results. This is definitely the right route to take in terms of taking search to the next level. Most other startups try to rebuild the search engine, which is fruitless. I&#8217;ve found them to be more effective than Google for finding what I want. It&#8217;s nice to see some new technology in search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361192</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/02/19/livecom-bigger-than-google-in-september-2008/#comment-361192</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you Boris.  I checked out ManagedQ and I was really shocked by the fact that it had real technology.  The biggest problem with search is there has been essentially no successful innovation in almost ten years.  I welcome the efforts of small guys like ManagedQ to invite change in this stagnant market.

Everyone should try ManagedQ for a week.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://beta1.managedq.com/conversion.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Try it out for a week here. &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you Boris.  I checked out ManagedQ and I was really shocked by the fact that it had real technology.  The biggest problem with search is there has been essentially no successful innovation in almost ten years.  I welcome the efforts of small guys like ManagedQ to invite change in this stagnant market.</p>
<p>Everyone should try ManagedQ for a week.</p>
<p><a href="http://beta1.managedq.com/conversion.php" rel="nofollow">Try it out for a week here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

