<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still hope for old-fashioned publishers!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2008/01/29/still-hope-for-old-fashioned-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/01/29/still-hope-for-old-fashioned-publishers/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 09:41:32 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/01/29/still-hope-for-old-fashioned-publishers/#comment-360764</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/01/29/still-hope-for-old-fashioned-publishers/#comment-360764</guid>
		<description>Interesting article and I agree with Fred Wilson that this is not a sustainable model. However, at this moment in time there seems to be an opportunity to link a very specific target group to the WSJ that is willing to pay the subscription fees. The WSJ doesn&#039;t want to broaden the reader group because there are advertisers out there that want to pay top dollars to advertise to this very specific group only. Of course this model will not hold in the long run</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article and I agree with Fred Wilson that this is not a sustainable model. However, at this moment in time there seems to be an opportunity to link a very specific target group to the WSJ that is willing to pay the subscription fees. The WSJ doesn&#8217;t want to broaden the reader group because there are advertisers out there that want to pay top dollars to advertise to this very specific group only. Of course this model will not hold in the long run</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim heineke</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/01/29/still-hope-for-old-fashioned-publishers/#comment-360763</link>
		<dc:creator>tim heineke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/2008/01/29/still-hope-for-old-fashioned-publishers/#comment-360763</guid>
		<description>mmm interesting...
Fred Wilson also has a good - but different view - on it.
http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/01/murdoch-makes-h.html
also interesting lead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmm interesting&#8230;<br />
Fred Wilson also has a good &#8211; but different view &#8211; on it.<br />
<a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/01/murdoch-makes-h.html" rel="nofollow">http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/01/murdoch-makes-h.html</a><br />
also interesting lead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

